not really necessary.
this is how legit tags are approved.
>>28539 @ Killer00100
wrong description and it usually is romantic(erotic).
no deepthroat and no Exhibitionism but good nonetheless.
Anatomy where natural nipples are replaced with a penis. ~PU
No not necessarily. A dickgirl is not a futa.
X-Dickgirls(male[penis] with feminine body), X-shemales(male[penis] with feminine body), or ⍻-hermaphrodites(Non characteristic body type born with both organs[this one is the only one close to being a futa]). Futas have both sexual organs, usually female dominate but can be male dominate as well.
The description is very bad,
"Intercourse between a male and a futanari."
The alt tag lookup is not needed.
No this is a misuse of a content there is an artist named Mayonnaise but the actual product not there. I vote for an actual removal of this content tag.
also a reference to milking a cock for cum. There's a few extras as well.
they are two separate series. So this edit is incorrect.
Pharuan Undearth on
no proper source and an absolutely crazy amount of submissions of same thing.
>>27244 @ Emberwind
blowjob, tentacles, public sex/exhibitionism, large/ big breasts are tags even from description. This tag needs a lot of refining for this to be valid especially in the Description and alternates are terrible it's way to long to be an alt tag.
Pharuan Undearth on
BBW BBM all sorts of tags on here for "fat".

Popular right now